Type of Offense: Spread. Zone read running plays and nearly all passing plays from the shotgun formation. There is rare to no use of a fullback. Tight End is used primarily as a blocking back (extra OL). Nearly all runs are made by the RB and QB save the occasional end around with the WR.
Type of Defense: 4-3. Fast OLBs with the WLB being stronger in pass coverage and the SLB being stouter versus the run. MLB is balanced and expected to make most of the tackles, especially versus the run game. A lot of Cover 2 with the MLB expected to get deep (15 yards) on a pass play. Corners on an island playing the edges with help over top. Gap responsibilities on the run game with DL and LB filling gaps and DE normally containing on the edge.
• Run/Pass %: 44/56
• Run/Pass Attempts: 383/477
• Points Per Game: 24.4
• Points Allowed Per Game: 26.0
Key Returning Players:
• Ryan Radcliff, QB: Returning starter at QB had over 3300 yards in 2010 and 17 TDs. He was a bright spot for a pretty efficient offense that was right on the cusp of winning more games in 2010. His biggest concern is the INTs as he threw 17 last season.
• Cody Wilson, WR: Leading returning WR with over 1100 yards and 5 TDs must get in the end zone more often in 2011 than he did in 2010. Has the chance to be one of the top WRs in the conference and could get over 1200 yards in 2011.
Key Incoming Freshmen:
• Ben McCord, WR: The tall (6-3) WR from Michigan may not have top notch speed but has the ability to be a possession receiver and a threat in the red zone as a freshman. Could surprise people with his play and turn a few heads in the MAC.
• Tim Hamilton, LB: This 3 star LB from Michigan is built for the MLB spot on defense. He is big and strong and athletic enough to make plays all over the field from the time he steps on the field.
Overall Assessment:
• 3-9 was a bit of bad luck for CMU as evidenced by the -1.6 points per game differential. Lost 5 games by 7 or fewer points last season showing that with a turnover here or a takeaway there and 6 or 7 wins could have happened. This 2011 CMU squad must figure out how to finish games and dominate the 4th quarter to pave way for big things in the MAC. Offensively, the passing game is impressive and looks to be just as good in 2011 with the QB and WR that led the team both returning. Defensively, if they can cut the points given up to about 22 or 23, then 7 wins is certainly possible. Best case scenario is 7 wins and a bowl appearance and a chance to show off this offense on a national stage. Worst case is not finishing again and winning 4 games in 2011.
Type of Defense: 4-3. Fast OLBs with the WLB being stronger in pass coverage and the SLB being stouter versus the run. MLB is balanced and expected to make most of the tackles, especially versus the run game. A lot of Cover 2 with the MLB expected to get deep (15 yards) on a pass play. Corners on an island playing the edges with help over top. Gap responsibilities on the run game with DL and LB filling gaps and DE normally containing on the edge.
• Run/Pass %: 44/56
• Run/Pass Attempts: 383/477
• Points Per Game: 24.4
• Points Allowed Per Game: 26.0
Key Returning Players:
• Ryan Radcliff, QB: Returning starter at QB had over 3300 yards in 2010 and 17 TDs. He was a bright spot for a pretty efficient offense that was right on the cusp of winning more games in 2010. His biggest concern is the INTs as he threw 17 last season.
• Cody Wilson, WR: Leading returning WR with over 1100 yards and 5 TDs must get in the end zone more often in 2011 than he did in 2010. Has the chance to be one of the top WRs in the conference and could get over 1200 yards in 2011.
Key Incoming Freshmen:
• Ben McCord, WR: The tall (6-3) WR from Michigan may not have top notch speed but has the ability to be a possession receiver and a threat in the red zone as a freshman. Could surprise people with his play and turn a few heads in the MAC.
• Tim Hamilton, LB: This 3 star LB from Michigan is built for the MLB spot on defense. He is big and strong and athletic enough to make plays all over the field from the time he steps on the field.
Overall Assessment:
• 3-9 was a bit of bad luck for CMU as evidenced by the -1.6 points per game differential. Lost 5 games by 7 or fewer points last season showing that with a turnover here or a takeaway there and 6 or 7 wins could have happened. This 2011 CMU squad must figure out how to finish games and dominate the 4th quarter to pave way for big things in the MAC. Offensively, the passing game is impressive and looks to be just as good in 2011 with the QB and WR that led the team both returning. Defensively, if they can cut the points given up to about 22 or 23, then 7 wins is certainly possible. Best case scenario is 7 wins and a bowl appearance and a chance to show off this offense on a national stage. Worst case is not finishing again and winning 4 games in 2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment