American Athletic Conference Team Statistic Rankings

SCORING OFFENSE

1. Memphis 36.2
2. ECU         35.8
3. Cincinnati 34.0
4. Navy 31.8 
5. Houston         29.8
6. UCF 28.1
7. Tulsa 24.7
8. Temple 23.1
9. USF 17.2
10. Tulane 16.0
11. UConn 15.5
12. SMU 11.1

SCORING DEFENSE

1. Temple 17.5
2. UCF 19.2
3. Memphis 19.5
4. Houston         20.6
5. ECU         25.8
6. USF 27.0
7. Cincinnati 27.2
8. Navy 27.3
9. Tulane 28.4
10. UConn 29.8
11. Tulsa 39.2
12. SMU 41.3

TOTAL OFFENSE

1. ECU            533.0
2. Cincinnati 460.2
3. Memphis 427.1
4. Tulsa 412.5
5. Houston         406.8
6. Navy 383.2
7. UCF 363.6
8. Tulane 344.2
9. Temple 308.4
10. USF 304.7
11. UConn 276.8
12. SMU 269.0

TOTAL DEFENSE

1. UCF 298.5
2. Houston         341.0
3. Temple 347.1
4. Memphis 349.5
5. ECU         367.3
6. UConn 378.4
7. Tulane 379.9
8. USF 402.8
9. Navy 403.8
10. Cincinnati 439.1
11. Tulsa 486.8
12. SMU 499.4

RUSHING OFFENSE

1. Navy 338.1
2. Memphis 190.5
3. Houston         183.6
4. ECU         161.1
5. Cincinnati 156.5
6. Tulsa 147.8
7. Tulane 145.2
8. UCF 128.3
9. USF 107.9
10. Temple 107.8
11. UConn 107.4
12. SMU 100.3

RUSHING DEFENSE

1. UCF 104.3
2. ECU         111.8
3. Memphis 121.5
4. Houston         143.0
5. Tulane 157.6
6. Temple 160.2
7. UConn 169.7
8. USF 182.9
9. Cincinnati 183.7
10. Navy 198.6
11. Tulsa 214.7
12. SMU 235.8

PASS OFFENSE

1. ECU         371.9
2. Cincinnati 303.6
3. Tulsa 264.7
4. Memphis 236.6
5. UCF 235.3
6. Houston         223.2
7. Temple 200.7
8. Tulane 199.0
9. USF 196.8
10. UConn 169.3
11. SMU 168.7
12. Navy 81.4

PASS DEFENSE

1. Temple 186.9
2. UCF 194.2
3. Houston         198.0
4. Navy 205.2
5. UConn 208.8
6. USF 219.8
7. Tulane 222.3
8. Memphis 228.0
9. Cincinnati 255.4
10. ECU         255.5
11. SMU 263.7
12. Tulsa 272.1

KICKOFF RETURNS

1. UCF 26.6
2. Memphis 22.8
3. USF 20.7
4. Tulsa 20.4
5. Navy 20.4
6. UConn 19.8
7. Temple 19.8
8. Cincinnati 19.6
9. ECU         19.1
10. SMU 18.8
11. Houston         18.0
12. Tulane 16.8

PUNT RETURN 

1. Temple 12.3
2. Memphis 8.8
3. UCF 8.5
4. Tulsa 7.5
5. UConn 6.8
6. USF 6.7
7. Houston         5.7
8. Cincinnati 5.6
9. ECU         4.6
10. Tulane 4.6
11. SMU 4.3
12. Navy 3.4  

PUNTING

1. USF 39.1
2. Tulsa 38.7
3. Navy 38.0
4. Memphis 38.0
5. Houston         36.8
6. ECU         36.6
7. UConn 36.2
8. Cincinnati 35.9
9. SMU 35.6
10. Temple 35.6
11. UCF 34.2
12. Tulane 34.1

3RD-DOWN CONVERSIONS

1. Navy 48.1
2. ECU         46.9
3. UCF 41.5
4. Cincinnati 41.2
5. Houston         40.4
6. Tulsa 38.4
7. USF 37.4
8. Memphis 36.7
9. Tulane 33.0
10. SMU 32.6
11. UConn 30.5
12. Temple 23.5

OPP 3RD-DN CONVERT

1. ECU         34.2
2. Temple 35.0
3. Memphis 35.3
4. UCF 37.1
5. Tulane 37.5
6. Houston         38.5
7. UConn 39.8
8. Tulsa 41.7
9. Navy 42.9
10. SMU 43.8
11. Cincinnati 44.1
12. USF 45.3

PENALTIES YPG

1. Navy 24.8
2. Cincinnati 41.7
3. SMU 52.7
4. UCF 54.3
5. Temple 54.4
6. Memphis 59.2
7. Houston         59.3
8. UConn 59.5
9. USF 60.7
10. Tulsa 64.0
11. Tulane 70.1
12. ECU         77.2

TIME OF POSSESSION

1. UCF 31:53
2. Tulsa 31:34
3. Tulane 30:31
4. Navy 30:23
5. Memphis 30:07
6. ECU         29:42
7. Houston         29:37
8. SMU 28:50
9. Cincinnati 28:42
10. UConn 28:24
11. USF 28:03
12. Temple 26:47

TURNOVER MARGIN

1. Memphis +11
2. Houston         +8
3. Tulane +3
4. Temple +3
5. Cincinnati +2
6. USF 0
7. UCF -1
8. Navy -4
9. ECU         -4
10. Tulsa -8
11. UConn -13
12. SMU -14

RED ZONE OFFENSE

1. Memphis 93.3
2. Cincinnati 90.2
3. Navy 87.3
4. ECU         83.8
5. UCF 80.4
6. Tulsa 76.1
7. Houston         73.7
8. USF 70.4
9. Temple 69.0
10. SMU 69.0
11. Tulane 66.7
12. UConn 58.3

RED ZONE DEFENSE

1. Tulane 66.7
2. Memphis 68.8
3. UCF 71.4
4. Temple 72.7
5. Cincinnati 73.1
6. Navy 78.8
7. Tulsa 82.7
8. SMU 83.1
9. ECU         84.6
10. UConn 84.8
11. Houston         86.4
12. USF 88.6

ATTENDANCE Home-Avg

1. ECU         6-44786
2. UCF 6-37812
3. Memphis 6-33851
4. Navy 5-32502
5. USF 7-30694
6. Cincinnati 6-28840
7. Houston         7-28311
8. UConn 7-27461
9. Tulane 6-25012
10. Temple 6-23370
11. SMU 6-21528
12. Tulsa 6-19647